#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Microbiome factors in HPV-driven carcinogenesis and cancers


Authors: Daniel Lin aff001;  Ramez Kouzy aff001;  Joseph Abi Jaoude aff001;  Sonal S. Noticewala aff001;  Andrea Y. Delgado Medrano aff001;  Ann H. Klopp aff001;  Cullen M. Taniguchi aff001;  Lauren E. Colbert aff001
Authors place of work: Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America aff001
Published in the journal: Microbiome factors in HPV-driven carcinogenesis and cancers. PLoS Pathog 16(6): e1008524. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008524
Category: Pearls
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008524

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections account for over 600,000 new cancer cases every year [1]. HPV is implicated in approximately 70% of oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs), 90% of anal cancers, and virtually all cases of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) in the U.S [2]. HPV carcinogenesis is mediated by its E6 and E7 oncoproteins, which force differentiating epithelial cells to re-enter the cell cycle to grow and increase viral production [3]. Although most HPV infections resolve over time, persistent infection can cause catastrophic cell-cycle instability and eventually lead to invasive cancer [2]. Nevertheless, HPV presence alone is insufficient for cancer formation. Factors unique to the individual mucosal sites such as epithelial surface integrity, mucosal secretions, immune regulation, and the local microbiota likely play a role in HPV persistence and progression to cancer [24]. Dysbiosis of the microbiome can have profound effects on overall health and has recently been linked to cancer progression and treatment responses [5].

Methodological advances in microbiome sequencing and analysis have enabled these recent sweeping advances in knowledge. In particular, 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicon sequencing is frequently used. This cost-effective method sequences specific hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene and clusters the identified bacteria into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that can quantify diversity metrics and relative abundances, as well as provide genus-level identification [6]. However, 16S rRNA subregion sequencing has inherent disadvantages, including the inability to provide species-level identification and metagenomic functionality.

These deficiencies could be overcome with whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing. WGS deciphers broad regions of entire microbial genomes with significantly more sequencing depth but at a greater cost and use of bioinformatics resources than 16S rRNA analysis [7]. Despite these barriers, notable advantages include enhanced species-level identification and accuracy, improved microbial diversity detection, insight into genome functionality and structure, and the ability to identify nonbacterial microorganisms such as viruses and fungi, which are also critical parts of a tissue’s microbiome [7]. Used in conjunction, these complementary methods may provide further clues to understanding the microbiome’s role in HPV carcinogenesis.

HPV cancers may be uniquely affected by the microbiome since these solid tumors arise in the mucosa of the orogenital tract, which each have unique and diverse microbiomes. Insights into the potential influence of the microbiome on viral persistence, immune response, host-mucosal environment, and cancer treatments for HPV-related cancers are just beginning to emerge. In this review, we will discuss how the microbiome may play a pivotal role in the formation of HPV-driven cancers.

Microbiome factors in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

The role of the microbiome in HPV-driven diseases has been extensively studied in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Table 1 presents an overview of key CIN and CIN-related (CIN/ICC) microbiome studies. In 1992, one of the first studies characterizing CIN microbiota utilizing laboratory culture discovered the characteristic presence of “abnormal vaginal flora,” which future studies would later confirm through 16S rRNA analysis [8]. Through the generation of reproducible microbiome archetypes, or community-state types (CSTs), 16S sequencing allowed CIN studies to cross-compare findings [9]. The most common CSTs found in CIN patients were CSTs characterized by Lactobacillus depletion, anaerobic bacteria predominance, and Lactobacillus iners dominance. These CSTs were significantly associated with preinvasive disease, increased disease severity, and disease invasiveness. Additionally, increased vaginal microbe diversity and richness were associated with increased rates of HPV infection and persistence, as well as higher CIN severity [1013]. Sneathia was significantly enriched in CIN samples in multiple studies, and its presence was associated with changes in immune mediators [12,14]. But, similar to the majority of “enriched microbiota” found using 16S, its pathogenic or protective role is not well understood.

Tab. 1. Summary of articles discussing the microbiome and HPV carcinogenesis.
Summary of articles discussing the microbiome and HPV carcinogenesis.

Lactobacillus species have been better studied and appear to serve primarily protective roles with some exceptions. L. crispatus dominance has been strongly associated with a healthy vaginal microbiome and is responsible for producing high quantities of lactic acid and secretion of protective proteins throughout mucosal microenvironment [15]. Conversely, L. iners is the most commonly reported Lactobacillus-dominated CST in CIN patients. L. iners produces low amounts of lactic acid with no reported host-protective peptide production. L. iners CSTs are also the most likely to transition to CSTs characteristic of CIN patients, possibly because of its ability to adapt to a variety of pH environments and its distinct lack of bacteriocin synthesis genes, all of which allow abnormal cervicovaginal bacteria to thrive [15,16].

An association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and CIN has long been suggested [17]. CIN and BV present similar vaginal microbiomes characterized by decreased Lactobacilli abundance, increased predominance of abnormal anaerobic bacteria, and increased diversity [17]. Studies suggest a variety of mechanisms in which BV may result in HPV persistence and CIN. Decreased abundance of lactic-acid–producing Lactobacilli resulting in abnormally high vaginal pH (>4.5) can cause bacterial overgrowth and decreases in protective flora [14]. This disruption in the colonization of protective microbiota can result in weakened defense mechanisms to fend off viral infections. BV is also associated with increased production of epithelial-lining–degrading enzymes which can allow HPV infection to initiate [17]. Additionally, BV has been associated with increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chronic inflammation at mucosal sites [18]. Women with BV expressed increased levels of cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β and decreased levels of antiinflammatory molecule SLPI (secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor) [18]. Furthermore, toll-like receptors (TLRs) act as a first-line of defense in recognizing viral infection and foreign bacteria. TLR9 has been suggested to recognize HPV infections and initiate an immune response, while E6 and E7 oncoproteins directly down-regulate TLR9 at a transcriptional level [19]. BV incidence has been associated with SNPs in TLR2/7, but their exact roles in BV are not well understood [20]. All of these bacterial, mucosal, and immune complications related to BV can result in an increased susceptibility to HPV infection and the development of high-grade intraepithelial lesions.

Microbiome factors in ICC

HPV persistence is necessary but insufficient for the formation of ICC, and it is now believed the local microbiota may play a role in tumorigenesis. Table 1 provides a summary of ICC-related microbiome studies. One study utilized shotgun metagenomic sequencing to reveal potential metabolic and functional roles of the microbiome involved in inflammation and defense mechanism pathways but additional WGS studies are required to confirm these findings [21]. Additionally, the gut microbiome and its role in ICC is beginning to emerge. Fecal samples from ICC patients exhibited unique gut microbiota composition with greater diversity when compared to healthy-matched controls [22,23]. Gut dysbiosis has been associated with tumorigenesis through inflammation and cytokine modulation, but its role in HPV clearance and cervical carcinogenesis is still unclear [5]. Our group’s ongoing studies suggest that both the cervical and gut microbiome are associated with treatment response in cervical cancers [24].

16S rRNA studies assessing the cervicovaginal microbiome account for the majority of ICC studies. ICC patients exhibit decreases in abundance of Lactobacillus spp., increases in overall bacterial diversity and richness, and an increased predominance of Fusobacterium spp. As with CIN, the ICC microbial profile resembles that of BV. The transition of CIN to invasive disease does not seem to result in major vaginal microbiome shifts, as similar states of dysbiosis facilitate the persistence and progression of HPV-driven disease. Although observed in both cervical disease states, Fusobacterium predominance was more commonly observed in ICC patients. Fusobacterium was found to be associated with increased levels of IL-4 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 mRNA, suggesting a role in immunosuppression within the ICC microenvironment [12]. Overall, 16S rRNA analysis demonstrates similar shifts within the ICC and CIN microbiome profiles that likely begin with the disappearance of Lactobacillus spp. This decline in the predominating protective bacteria results in increased vaginal pH levels, weakened pathogenic defenses, and damaged mucosal barriers [14,17,25]. Eventually, these conditions allow for opportunistic anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria to thrive driving the diversity of the cervical microbiome to a state of dysbiosis. Foreign bacteria cause disrupted immune responses and elevated inflammation levels [20]. Together, these factors contribute to an optimal environment for HPV carcinogenesis.

Microbiome factors in other HPV-driven cancers

Despite numerous studies assessing the microbiome in oral cavity cancers (OCCs) and OPCs, most of these studies do not specify HPV positivity or instead focus on non-HPV–related oral cancers. The section labeled HNSCC (Head Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma) in Table 1 presents the studies focusing on HPV-positive oral cancers and OPCs. In unknown HPV-status OCCs, bacteria colonizing the tumor site were determined to be significantly different than matching contralateral normal mucosa samples [26]. Furthermore, sensitive microbial variations at intraoral sites like the tooth surface, gums, and tongue exist [27]. These findings suggest the importance of site sampling and sampling collection methods when comparing oral microbiome analyses. When considering HPV positivity, HPV-positive OCC and OPC patients exhibit distinct oral microbiome profiles from both healthy controls and HPV-negative OCC and OPC patients, suggesting the presence of HPV influences the composition of the oral microbiome [26,28]. HPV-positive OCC and OPC patients both showed an abundance of Gemella and Leuconostoc, while Haemophilus correlated with HPV infection [26,28]. 16S rRNA sequencing on saliva and oral rinse samples of OCC and OPC patients revealed a decrease in richness and diversity when compared to control patients [26,28]. This decrease in diversity is opposite to cervical patients and suggests that a few dominating, pathogenic bacteria may be influencing HPV persistence and carcinogenesis in the oral environment.

Interestingly, Lactobacillus spp. were found to be significantly associated with HPV-positive OPC patient saliva samples [26,29]. In a follow-up study, species-level context was provided for the Lactobacillus spp. using high-resolution 16S rRNA analysis. A subset of OPC patient samples were enriched with commensal species from the vaginal flora, including L. gasseri/johnsonii and L. vaginalis, not seen in control groups nor saliva from the Human Microbiome Project [29]. The discovery of Lactobacillus in the oral microbiome of these samples is not well understood, as Lactobacillus is often protective in vaginal and oral contexts [29]. It was suggested that these normally commensal vaginal species could have been transferred to the oral flora during oral sex, which, if validated, would have interesting implications in the role of vaginal-associated Lactobacillus during oral HPV disease.

Beyond cervical cancers and OPCs, research characterizing the microbiome of other HPV-driven cancers is relatively nonexistent. Characterization of the anal cancer microbiome would be particularly interesting because of direct interactions with the gut microbiota, but studies have yet to be published, likely because of disease rarity.

Conclusion and future directions

The identification of bacterial composition changes in HPV-associated cervical cancers and OPCs has provided valuable insight into potential target populations of interest and possible biomarkers of disease and disease-state.

CIN and ICC patient 16S rRNA bacterial profiles have largely been established across multiple studies, and they exhibit shared characteristics pathognomonic to BV, including decreased Lactobacillus presence, increased microbial diversity, and increased predominance of atypical, anaerobic bacteria. These distinct features of BV are involved in the overall weakening of the immune and mucosal defense response against invading pathogens and pathogen clearance through a variety of mechanisms, including the release of mucin-degrading enzymes, disrupted pH maintenance, cytokine modulation, and chronic inflammation. In comparison, research characterizing the microbiome of HPV-driven oral and oropharyngeal cancers is limited. But still, microbiome profiles of OCC and OPC patients exhibit significantly different microbiota compositions when compared to healthy controls. Additionally, these cancers exhibit a significant decrease in microbial diversity, which will likely benefit future studies because the pool of potentially pathogenic bacteria is much more limited. Specific genera found within the oral microbiome of HPV+ OPC and OCC patients like Gemella, Leuconostoc, and, unexpectedly, commensal vagina Lactobacillus spp. provide an interesting starting point for future investigations.

The microbiome field regarding HPV-driven cancers is quickly emerging with the majority of research dedicated to characterizing bacterial profiles, but much is still unknown. Outside of HPV-driven cancers, microbiome research on viruses, fungi, and other microorganisms of the human flora and their relationships to disease are gaining interest [30,31]. Bacteria have also been reported to affect cancer treatment response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in both preclinical and clinical studies in non-viral–related cancers [32,33]. To our knowledge, preclinical animal studies investigating the HPV microbiome have not been performed, possibly because of suboptimal papillomavirus-tumor models and difficulties in modeling the human microbiome in animals. Furthermore, the majority of HPV-related carcinoma studies utilize cross-sectional sampling methods. The addition of longitudinal studies would provide unique information into changes within the microbiome throughout disease progression, treatment, and follow-up.

While all HPV-driven cancer microbiomes require additional taxonomic characterization, the field would benefit immensely from mechanistic studies that describe the relationship of microbiota and the immune response to HPV infection, clearance, and carcinogenesis. More sensitive sequencing techniques and metabolomics could provide insight into specific microorganisms and associated gene expression and metabolite changes. Combining these data with rigorous immune analyses such as antigen stimulation, immune profiling, and computational analysis of sequence homology could provide critical molecular clues in understanding the microbiome’s role in tumor immunity activation and anergy. Continued understanding of the pathogenic microbiota through clinical investigation and validation in preclinical models could help rapidly shed light on this evolving field.


Zdroje

1. Arbyn M, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Sideri M, Palefsky J, Lacey C, et al. EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV-related disease. Int J Cancer J Int Cancer. 2012;131: 1969–1982. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27650 22623137

2. Schiffman M, Doorbar J, Wentzensen N, de Sanjosé S, Fakhry C, Monk BJ, et al. Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2016;2: 16086. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.86 27905473

3. Pyeon D, Pearce SM, Lank SM, Ahlquist P, Lambert PF. Establishment of Human Papillomavirus Infection Requires Cell Cycle Progression. Münger K, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5: e1000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000318 19247434

4. FERNANDES JV, DE MEDEIROS FERNANDES TAA, DE AZEVEDO JCV, COBUCCI RNO, DE CARVALHO MGF, ANDRADE VS, et al. Link between chronic inflammation and human papillomavirus-induced carcinogenesis (Review). Oncol Lett. 2015;9: 1015–1026. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2884 25663851

5. Chang AH, Parsonnet J. Role of Bacteria in Oncogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23: 837–857. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00012-10 20930075

6. D’Amore R, Ijaz UZ, Schirmer M, Kenny JG, Gregory R, Darby AC, et al. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling. BMC Genomics. 2016;17: 55. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2194-9 26763898

7. Ranjan R, Rani A, Metwally A, McGee HS, Perkins DL. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;469: 967–977. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.083 26718401

8. Guijon F, Paraskevas M, Rand F, Heywood E, Brunham R, McNicol P. Vaginal microbial flora as a cofactor in the pathogenesis of uterine cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1992;37: 185–191. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(92)90379-W

9. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108: 4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107 20534435

10. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, Smith A, Marchesi JR, Lehne B, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 16865. doi: 10.1038/srep16865 26574055

11. Piyathilake CJ, Ollberding NJ, Kumar R, Macaluso M, Alvarez RD, Morrow CD. Cervical Microbiota Associated with Higher Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Infected with High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses. Cancer Prev Res Phila Pa. 2016;9: 357–366. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0350 26935422

12. Audirac-Chalifour A, Torres-Poveda K, Bahena-Román M, Téllez-Sosa J, Martínez-Barnetche J, Cortina-Ceballos B, et al. Cervical Microbiome and Cytokine Profile at Various Stages of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study. Tornesello ML, editor. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0153274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153274 27115350

13. Klein C, Gonzalez D, Samwel K, Kahesa C, Mwaiselage J, Aluthge N, et al. Relationship between the Cervical Microbiome, HIV Status, and Precancerous Lesions. mBio. 2019;10: e02785–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02785-18 30782659

14. Łaniewski P, Barnes D, Goulder A, Cui H, Roe DJ, Chase DM, et al. Linking cervicovaginal immune signatures, HPV and microbiota composition in cervical carcinogenesis in non-Hispanic and Hispanic women. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 7593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25879-7 29765068

15. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, Bennett PR, Kyrgiou M. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome. 2016;4: 58. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0203-0 27802830

16. Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Anukam KC, Cribby S, Reid G. At the crossroads of vaginal health and disease, the genome sequence of Lactobacillus iners AB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108: 4688–4695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000086107 21059957

17. Gillet E, Meys JFA, Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, De Sutter P, Temmerman M, et al. Association between Bacterial Vaginosis and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e45201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045201 23056195

18. Mitchell C, Marrazzo J. Bacterial vaginosis and the cervicovaginal immune response. Am J Reprod Immunol N Y N 1989. 2014;71: 555–563. doi: 10.1111/aji.12264 24832618

19. Wakabayashi R, Nakahama Y, Nguyen V, Espinoza JL. The Host-Microbe Interplay in Human Papillomavirus-Induced Carcinogenesis. Microorganisms. 2019;7: E199. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7070199 31337018

20. Mackelprang RD, Scoville CW, Cohen CR, Ondondo RO, Bigham AW, Celum C, et al. Toll-like receptor gene variants and bacterial vaginosis among HIV-1 infected and uninfected African women. Genes Immun. 2015;16: 362–365. doi: 10.1038/gene.2015.13 25928881

21. Kwon M, Seo S-S, Kim M, Lee D, Lim M. Compositional and Functional Differences between Microbiota and Cervical Carcinogenesis as Identified by Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing. Cancers. 2019;11: 309. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030309 30841606

22. Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhao J, Gong L, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Altered diversity and composition of the gut microbiome in patients with cervical cancer. AMB Express. 2019;9: 40. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0763-z 30904962

23. Sims TT, Colbert LE, Zheng J, Delgado Medrano AY, Hoffman KL, Ramondetta L, et al. Gut microbial diversity and genus-level differences identified in cervical cancer patients versus healthy controls. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(2):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.002 31500892

24. Colbert LE, Delgado Medrano AY, Mikkelson MD, Previs R, Eifel PJ, Jhingran A, et al. Clonal Expansion of Antigen Specific T-Cells during Radiation Therapy for HPV Associated Cervical Cancers Is Regulated By the Vaginal Microbiome. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2018;102: S24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.145

25. Mitchell C, Fredricks D, Agnew K, Hitti J. Hydrogen Peroxide-Producing Lactobacilli Are Associated With Lower Levels of Vaginal Interleukin-1β, Independent of Bacterial Vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42: 358–363. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000298 26222747

26. Guerrero-Preston R, Godoy-Vitorino F, Jedlicka A, Rodríguez-Hilario A, González H, Bondy J, et al. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer, human papilloma virus infection and surgical treatment. Oncotarget. 2016;7: 51320–51334. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9710 27259999

27. Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W. Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9: 259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-259 20003481

28. Lim Y, Fukuma N, Totsika M, Kenny L, Morrison M, Punyadeera C. The Performance of an Oral Microbiome Biomarker Panel in Predicting Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancers. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8: 267. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00267 30123780

29. Guerrero-Preston R, White JR, Godoy-Vitorino F, Rodríguez-Hilario A, Navarro K, González H, et al. High-resolution microbiome profiling uncovers Fusobacterium nucleatum, Lactobacillus gasseri/johnsonii, and Lactobacillus vaginalis associated to oral and oropharyngeal cancer in saliva from HPV positive and HPV negative patients treated with surgery and chemo-radiation. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 110931–110948. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20677 29340028

30. Ogilvie LA, Jones BV. The human gut virome: a multifaceted majority. Front Microbiol. 2015;6: 918. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00918 26441861

31. Aykut B, Pushalkar S, Chen R, Li Q, Abengozar R, Kim JI, et al. The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL. Nature. 2019;574: 264–267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1608-2 31578522

32. Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, et al. Commensal Bacteria Control Cancer Response to Therapy by Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment. Science. 2013;342: 967–970. doi: 10.1126/science.1240527 24264989

33. Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359: 97–103. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4236 29097493


Článek vyšel v časopise

PLOS Pathogens


2020 Číslo 6
Nejčtenější tento týden
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvyšte si kvalifikaci online z pohodlí domova

Hypertenze a hypercholesterolémie – synergický efekt léčby
nový kurz
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Hana Rosolová, DrSc.

Multidisciplinární zkušenosti u pacientů s diabetem
Autoři: Prof. MUDr. Martin Haluzík, DrSc., prof. MUDr. Vojtěch Melenovský, CSc., prof. MUDr. Vladimír Tesař, DrSc.

Úloha kombinovaných preparátů v léčbě arteriální hypertenze
Autoři: prof. MUDr. Martin Haluzík, DrSc.

Halitóza
Autoři: MUDr. Ladislav Korábek, CSc., MBA

Terapie roztroušené sklerózy v kostce
Autoři: MUDr. Dominika Šťastná, Ph.D.

Všechny kurzy
Přihlášení
Zapomenuté heslo

Zadejte e-mailovou adresu, se kterou jste vytvářel(a) účet, budou Vám na ni zaslány informace k nastavení nového hesla.

Přihlášení

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte se

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#