Projected impact of the Portuguese sugar-sweetened beverage tax on obesity incidence across different age groups: A modelling study
Autoři:
Francisco Goiana-da-Silva aff001; Milton Severo aff002; David Cruz e Silva aff004; Maria João Gregório aff005; Luke N. Allen aff007; Magdalena Muc aff008; Alexandre Morais Nunes aff009; Duarte Torres aff003; Marisa Miraldo aff010; Hutan Ashrafian aff012; Ana Rito aff013; Kremlin Wickramasinghe aff014; João Breda aff014; Ara Darzi aff012; Fernando Araújo aff015; Carla Lopes aff002
Působiště autorů:
Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
aff001; Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
aff002; Epidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
aff003; Centre for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
aff004; Directorate General of Health, Lisbon, Portugal
aff005; Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
aff006; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
aff007; Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
aff008; Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
aff009; Department of Economics and Public Policy, Imperial College Business School, London, United Kingdom
aff010; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Innovation, Imperial College Business School, London, United Kingdom
aff011; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
aff012; WHO Collaborating Centre for Nutrition and Childhood Obesity, National Institute of Health (INSA), Lisbon, Portugal
aff013; WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation
aff014; University Hospital of São João, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
aff015
Vyšlo v časopise:
Projected impact of the Portuguese sugar-sweetened beverage tax on obesity incidence across different age groups: A modelling study. PLoS Med 17(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003036
Kategorie:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003036
Souhrn
Background
Excessive consumption of sugar has a well-established link with obesity. Preliminary results show that a tax levied on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) by the Portuguese government in 2017 led to a drop in sales and reformulation of these products. This study models the impact the market changes triggered by the tax levied on SSBs had on obesity incidence across various age groups in Portugal.
Methods and findings
We performed a national market analysis and population-wide modelling study using market data for the years 2014–2018 from the Portuguese Association of Non-Alcoholic Drinks (GlobalData and Nielsen Consumer Panel), dietary data from a national survey (IAN-AF 2015–2016), and obesity incidence data from several cohort studies. Dietary energy density from SSBs was calculated by dividing the energy content (kcal/gram) of all SSBs by the total food consumption (in grams). We used the potential impact fraction (PIF) equation to model the projected impact of the tax-triggered change in sugar consumption on obesity incidence, through both volume reduction and reformulation. Results showed a reduction of 6.6 million litres of SSBs sold per year. Product reformulation led to a decrease in the average energy density of SSBs by 3.1 kcal/100 ml. This is estimated to have prevented around 40–78 cases of obesity per year between 2016 and 2018, with the biggest projected impact observed in adolescents 10 to <18 years old. The model shows that the implementation of this tax allowed for a 4 to 8 times larger projected impact against obesity than would be achieved though reformulation alone. The main limitation of this study is that the model we used includes data from various sources, which can result in biases—despite our efforts to mitigate them—related to the methodological differences between these sources.
Conclusions
The tax triggered both a reduction in demand and product reformulation. These, together, can reduce obesity levels among frequent consumers of SSBs. Such taxation is an effective population-wide intervention. Reformulation alone, without the decrease in sales, would have had a far smaller effect on obesity incidence in the Portuguese population.
Klíčová slova:
Adolescents – Age groups – Beverages – Food consumption – Obesity – Portugal – Taxation – Taxes
Zdroje
1. Oliveira A, Araujo J, Severo M, Correia D, Ramos E, Torres D, et al. Prevalence of general and abdominal obesity in Portugal: comprehensive results from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015–2016. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5480-z 29747603
2. Barreto M, Gaio V, Kislaya I, Antunes L, Rodrigues AP, Silva AC, et al. 1º Inquérito Nacional de Saúde com Exame Físico (INSEF 2015): estado de saúde. Lisbon: National Institute of Health; 2016.
3. Jorge R. Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative—COSI Portugal 2019. Lisbon: National Institute of Health; 2019.
4. Woodward-Lopez G, Kao J, Ritchie L. To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic? Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(3):499–509. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002375 20860886
5. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, Lustig RH, et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;120(11):1011–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627 19704096
6. Luger M, Lafontan M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Winzer E, Yumuk V, Farpour-Lambert N. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review from 2013 to 2015 and a comparison with previous studies. Obes Facts. 2017;10(6):674–93. doi: 10.1159/000484566 29237159
7. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):274–88. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.274 16895873
8. World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
9. Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman JL, Tollman SM, Bertram MY, Hofman KJ. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1072. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1072 24225016
10. Briggs AD, Mytton OT, Madden D, O’Shea D, Rayner M, Scarborough P. The potential impact on obesity of a 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Ireland, an effect assessment modelling study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:860. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-860 24044370
11. Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6189 24179043
12. Statistics Portugal. Balança alimentar Portuguesa (1990–2012). Madrid: Statistics Portugal; 2014.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: new food balances—metadata. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 245]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS/metadata.
14. Marinho AR, Severo M, Correia D, Lobato L, Vilela S, Oliveira A, et al. Total, added and free sugar intakes, dietary sources and determinants of consumption in Portugal: the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (IAN-AF 2015–2016). Public Health Nutr. 2019:1–13. doi: 10.1017/s1368980019002519 31486357
15. Lopes C, Torres D, Oliveira A, Severo M, Alarcão V, Guiomar S, et al. National food, nutrition, and physical activity survey of the Portuguese general population, IAN-AF 2015–2016: summary of results. Porto: University of Porto; 2018.
16. Vilela S, Oliveira A, Ramos E, Moreira P, Barros H, Lopes C. Association between energy-dense food consumption at 2 years of age and diet quality at 4 years of age. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(7):1275–82. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513003620 24229473
17. Diário da República nº 248/2016 Série I de 2016-12-28. Lei 42/2016. Orçamento do Estado para 2017. Secção III. Impostos especiais de consumo. Artigo 211. Imposto sobre o álcool, as bebidas alcoólicas e as bebidas adicionadas de açúcar ou outros edulcorantes (IABA). 2016 Dec 28.
18. Goiana-da-Silva F, Cruz ESD, Gregorio MJ, Miraldo M, Darzi A, Araujo F. The future of the sweetened beverages tax in Portugal. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(12):e562. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30240-8 30522681
19. Goiana-da-Silva F, Nunes AM, Miraldo M, Bento A, Breda J, Araújo FF. Fiscalidade ao serviço da saúde pública: a experiência na tributação das bebidas açucaradas em Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(4):191–5. doi: 10.20344/amp.10222 29855411
20. Goiana-da-Silva F, Cruz ESD, Allen L, Gregorio MJ, Severo M, Nogueira PJ, et al. Modelling impacts of food industry co-regulation on noncommunicable disease mortality, Portugal. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(7):450–9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220566 31258214
21. Zulman DM, Vijan S, Omenn GS, Hayward RA. The relative merits of population-based and targeted prevention strategies. Milbank Q. 2008;86(4):557–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00534.x 19120980
22. Drescher K, Becher H. Estimating the generalized impact fraction from case-control data. Biometrics. 1997;53(3):1170–6. 9290235
23. Lopes C, Torres D, Oliveira A, Severo M, Guiomar S, Alarcao V, et al. National food, nutrition, and physical activity survey of the Portuguese general population (2015–2016): protocol for design and development. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8990 29449204
24. Larsen PS, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Adamson A, Barros H, Bonde JP, Brescianini S, et al. Pregnancy and birth cohort resources in Europe: a large opportunity for aetiological child health research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):393–414. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12060 23772942
25. Freitas AI, Moreira C, Santos AC. Time trends in prevalence and incidence rates of childhood overweight and obesity in Portugal: Generation XXI birth cohort. Int J Obes. 2018;43(2):424. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0286-8 30568261
26. Ramos E, Barros H. Family and school determinants of overweight in 13-year-old Portuguese adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(2):281–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00107.x 17429921
27. Ramos E, Lopes C, Barros H. Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case-control study on myocardial infarction. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(6):437–41. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.013 15246333
28. Marshall A, Altman DG, Holder RL, Royston P. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-57 19638200
29. Fletcher JM, Frisvold DE, Tefft N. The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes. J Public Econ. 2010;94(11):967–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.005
30. Rouhani MH, Haghighatdoost F, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L. Associations between dietary energy density and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrition. 2016;32(10):1037–47. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.03.017 27238958
31. Camoes M, Lopes C, Oliveira A, Santos AC, Barros H. Overall and central obesity incidence in an urban Portuguese population. Prev Med. 2010;50(1–2):50–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.11.004 19945478
32. Teng AM, Jones AC, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genc M, Wilson N. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(9):1187–204. doi: 10.1111/obr.12868 31218808
33. Vall Castello J. Impact of SSB taxes on consumption. Food and Health Economics Workshop; 2018 Jun 7–8; Toulouse, France.
34. Capacci S, Allais O, Bonnet C, Mazzocchi M. The impact of the French soda tax on prices, purchases: an ex post evaluation. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223196 31603901
35. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(10):1865–71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362 27552267
36. Lee MM, Falbe J, Schillinger D, Basu S, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption 3 years after the Berkeley, California, sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(4):637–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304971 30789776
37. Alvarado M, Unwin N, Sharp SJ, Hambleton I, Murphy MM, Samuels TA, et al. Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7 30700311
38. Caro JC, Corvalan C, Reyes M, Silva A, Popkin B, Taillie LS. Chile’s 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: an observational study in an urban environment. PLoS Med. 2018;15(7):e1002597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002597 29969444
39. Fletcher JM, Frisvold D, Tefft N. Can soft drink taxes reduce population weight? Contemp Econ Policy. 2010;28(1):23–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2009.00182.x 20657817
40. Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Zepeda-Tello R, Rodrigues ER, Colchero MA, Rojas-Martinez R, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Expected population weight and diabetes impact of the 1-peso-per-litre tax to sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0176336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176336 28520716
41. Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, et al. Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: a cost-effectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(6):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326 28654688
42. Encarnação R, Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Capewell S. Obesity prevention strategies: could food or soda taxes improve health? J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2016;46(1):32–8. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2016.109 27092368
43. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M. Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: impact on overweight and obesity in Germany. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3938-4 28095809
44. Santos CMd. Imposto sobre as bebidas não alcoólicas adicionadas de açúcar ou outros edulcorantes: qual efetividade? Uma análise exploratória. Lisbon: National School of Public Health; 2018.
45. Gonçalves J, Santos JPd. Brown sugar, how come you taste so good? The impact of a soda tax on prices and consumption. Lisbon: Ministry of Economy Office for Strategy and Studies; 2019.
46. Cobiac LJ, Vos T, Veerman JL. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce dietary salt intake. Heart. 2010;96(23):1920–5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.199240 21041840
Článek vyšel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2020 Číslo 3
- FDA varuje před selfmonitoringem cukru pomocí chytrých hodinek. Jak je to v Česku?
- Proč se v Česku šíří několik „vymýcených“ infekcí najednou? Ptáme se odborníků
- Prof. Jan Škrha: Metformin je bezpečný, ale je třeba jej bezpečně užívat a léčbu kontrolovat
- Jak souvisí postcovidový syndrom s poškozením mozku?
- Umělá inteligence pomůže s výběrem chřipkových kmenů pro výrobu vakcín
Nejčtenější v tomto čísle
- Dietary fibre and whole grains in diabetes management: Systematic review and meta-analyses
- An Integrative Adapt Therapy for common mental health symptoms and adaptive stress amongst Rohingya, Chin, and Kachin refugees living in Malaysia: A randomized controlled trial
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: The FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial
- Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination with a high-density microarray patch: Results from a randomized, controlled phase I clinical trial