1. HollandAJ, ClevelandDW (2012) Losing balance: the origin and impact of aneuploidy in cancer. EMBO Rep 13: 501–514.
2. WestermannS, DrubinDG, BarnesG (2007) Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 563–591.
3. CheesemanIM, DesaiA (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 33–46.
4. SantaguidaS, MusacchioA (2009) The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J 28: 2511–2531.
5. BloomK, JoglekarA (2010) Towards building a chromosome segregation machine. Nature 463: 446–456.
6. LampertF, WestermannS (2011) A blueprint for kinetochores - new insights into the molecular mechanics of cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 407–412.
7. AllshireRC, KarpenGH (2008) Epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin: old dogs, new tricks? Nat Rev Genet 9: 923–937.
8. BlackBE, ClevelandDW (2011) Epigenetic Centromere Propagation and the Nature of CENP-A Nucleosomes. Cell 144: 471–479.
9. McAinshAD, TytellJD, SorgerPK (2003) Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19: 519–539.
10. TakeuchiK, FukagawaT (2012) Molecular architecture of vertebrate kinetochores. Exp Cell Res 318: 1367–1374.
11. TanakaK, ChangHL, KagamiA, WatanabeY (2009) CENP-C functions as a scaffold for effectors with essential kinetochore functions in mitosis and meiosis. Dev Cell 17: 334–343.
12. OkadaM, CheesemanIM, HoriT, OkawaK, McLeodIX, et al. (2006) The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat Cell Biol 8: 446–457.
13. CarrollCW, StraightAF (2006) Centromere formation: from epigenetics to self-assembly. Trends Cell Biol 16: 70–78.
14. CheesemanIM, ChappieJS, Wilson-KubalekEM, DesaiA (2006) The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127: 983–997.
15. AkiyoshiB, SarangapaniKK, PowersAF, NelsonCR, ReichowSL, et al. (2010) Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468: 576–579.
16. KlineSL, CheesemanIM, HoriT, FukagawaT, DesaiA (2006) The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 173: 9–17.
17. CheesemanIM, HoriT, FukagawaT, DesaiA (2008) KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol Biol Cell 19: 587–594.
18. DaviesAE, KaplanKB (2010) Hsp90-Sgt1 and Skp1 target human Mis12 complexes to ensure efficient formation of kinetochore-microtubule binding sites. J Cell Biol 189: 261–274.
19. MaskellDP, HuXW, SingletonMR (2010) Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex. J Cell Biol 190: 823–834.
20. PetrovicA, PasqualatoS, DubeP, KrennV, SantaguidaS, et al. (2010) The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 190: 835–852.
21. PrzewlokaMR, VenkeiZ, Bolanos-GarciaVM, DebskiJ, DadlezM, et al. (2011) CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr Biol 21: 399–405.
22. ScrepantiE, De AntoniA, AlushinGM, PetrovicA, MelisT, et al. (2011) Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Curr Biol 21: 391–398.
23. DeshaiesRJ, JoazeiroCA (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 399–434.
24. HershkoA (2005) The ubiquitin system for protein degradation and some of its roles in the control of the cell division cycle. Cell Death Differ 12: 1191–1197.
25. KavsakP, RasmussenRK, CausingCG, BonniS, ZhuH, et al. (2000) Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Mol Cell 6: 1365–1375.
26. JuD, WangX, XuH, XieY (2008) Genome-wide analysis identifies MYND-domain protein Mub1 as an essential factor for Rpn4 ubiquitylation. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1404–1412.
27. Moreno-MorenoO, Torras-LlortM, AzorinF (2006) Proteolysis restricts localization of CID, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant of Drosophila, to centromeres. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 6247–6255.
28. CollinsKA, FuruyamaS, BigginsS (2004) Proteolysis contributes to the exclusive centromere localization of the yeast Cse4/CENP-A histone H3 variant. Curr Biol 14: 1968–1972.
29. KaplanKB, HymanAA, SorgerPK (1997) Regulating the yeast kinetochore by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and Skp1p-mediated phosphorylation. Cell 91: 491–500.
30. KopskiKM, HuffakerTC (1997) Suppressors of the ndc10-2 mutation: a role for the ubiquitin system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore function. Genetics 147: 409–420.
31. WangL, MaoX, JuD, XieY (2004) Rpn4 is a physiological substrate of the Ubr2 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem 279: 55218–55223.
32. JuD, WangL, MaoX, XieY (2004) Homeostatic regulation of the proteasome via an Rpn4-dependent feedback circuit. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321: 51–57.
33. AndresonBL, GuptaA, GeorgievaBP, RothsteinR (2010) The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, Sml1, is sequentially phosphorylated, ubiquitylated and degraded in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 6490–6501.
34. NillegodaNB, TheodorakiMA, MandalAK, MayoKJ, RenHY, et al. (2010) Ubr1 and Ubr2 function in a quality control pathway for degradation of unfolded cytosolic proteins. Mol Biol Cell 21: 2102–2116.
35. AkiyoshiB, NelsonCR, RanishJA, BigginsS (2009) Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit. Genes Dev 23: 2887–2899.
36. EverettRD, EarnshawWC, FindlayJ, LomonteP (1999) Specific destruction of kinetochore protein CENP-C and disruption of cell division by herpes simplex virus immediate-early protein Vmw110. EMBO J 18: 1526–1538.
37. WestermannS, CheesemanIM, AndersonS, YatesJR3rd, DrubinDG, et al. (2003) Architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore reveals a conserved molecular core. J Cell Biol 163: 215–222.
38. WelburnJP, VleugelM, LiuD, YatesJR3rd, LampsonMA, et al. (2010) Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 38: 383–392.
39. RanjitkarP, PressMO, YiX, BakerR, MacCossMJ, BigginsS (2010) An E3 ubiquitin ligase prevents ectopic localization of the centromeric histone H3 variant via the centromere targeting domain. Mol Cell 40: 455–464.
40. GoshimaG, YanagidaM (2000) Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100: 619–633.
41. StraightAF, BelmontAS, RobinettCC, MurrayAW (1996) GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol 6: 1599–1608.
42. GohPY, KilmartinJV (1993) NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 121: 503–512.
43. WiggePA, JensenON, HolmesS, SouesS, MannM, et al. (1998) Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. J Cell Biol 141: 967–977.
44. HeX, AsthanaS, SorgerPK (2000) Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101: 763–775.
45. PearsonCG, YehE, GardnerM, OddeD, SalmonED, et al. (2004) Stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment constrains centromere positioning in metaphase. Curr Biol 14: 1962–1967.
46. PinskyBA, KungC, ShokatKM, BigginsS (2006) The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 8: 78–83.
47. PengY, WongCC, NakajimaY, TyersRG, SarkeshikAS, et al. (2011) Overlapping kinetochore targets of CK2 and Aurora B kinases in mitotic regulation. Mol Biol Cell 22: 2680–2689.
48. LiR, MurrayAW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66: 519–531.
49. HoytMA, TotisL, RobertsBT (1991) S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66: 507–517.
50. MarstonAL, ThamWH, ShahH, AmonA (2004) A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for centromeric cohesion. Science 303: 1367–1370.
51. CorbettKD, YipCK, EeLS, WalzT, AmonA, et al. (2010) The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosome-microtubule attachments. Cell 142: 556–567.
52. BettingJ, SeufertW (1996) A yeast Ubc9 mutant protein with temperature-sensitive in vivo function is subject to conditional proteolysis by a ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 271: 25790–25796.
53. BordalloJ, PlemperRK, FingerA, WolfDH (1998) Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins. Mol Biol Cell 9: 209–222.
54. BaysNW, GardnerRG, SeeligLP, JoazeiroCA, HamptonRY (2001) Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol 3: 24–29.
55. BrewCT, HuffakerTC (2002) The yeast ubiquitin protease, Ubp3p, promotes protein stability. Genetics 162: 1079–1089.
56. GardnerRG, NelsonZW, GottschlingDE (2005) Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120: 803–815.
57. EmanueleMJ, LanW, JwaM, MillerSA, ChanCS, et al. (2008) Aurora B kinase and protein phosphatase 1 have opposing roles in modulating kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 181: 241–254.
58. YangY, WuF, WardT, YanF, WuQ, et al. (2008) Phosphorylation of HsMis13 by Aurora B kinase is essential for assembly of functional kinetochore. J Biol Chem 283: 26726–26736.
59. KiyomitsuT, MurakamiH, YanagidaM (2011) Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol Cell Biol 31: 998–1011.
60. AmannJM, NipJ, StromDK, LutterbachB, HaradaH, et al. (2001) ETO, a target of t(8;21) in acute leukemia, makes distinct contacts with multiple histone deacetylases and binds mSin3A through its oligomerization domain. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6470–6483.
61. IsobeT, UchidaC, HattoriT, KitagawaK, OdaT, et al. (2006) Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of adenovirus E1A protein is inhibited by BS69. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 339: 367–374.
62. ChoiKO, LeeT, LeeN, KimJH, YangEG, et al. (2005) Inhibition of the catalytic activity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-prolyl-hydroxylase 2 by a MYND-type zinc finger. Mol Pharmacol 68: 1803–1809.
63. HessonLB, CooperWN, LatifF (2007) Evaluation of the 3p21.3 tumour-suppressor gene cluster. Oncogene 26: 7283–7301.
64. Rose MD, Winston F, Heiter P (1990) Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. p. 198 p.
65. BrownMT, GoetschL, HartwellLH (1993) MIF2 is required for mitotic spindle integrity during anaphase spindle elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 123: 387–403.
66. GhislainM, UdvardyA, MannC (1993) S. cerevisiae 26S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature 366: 358–362.
67. NekrasovVS, SmithMA, Peak-ChewS, KilmartinJV (2003) Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 14: 4931–4946.
68. OrtizJ, StemmannO, RankS, LechnerJ (1999) A putative protein complex consisting of Ctf19, Mcm21, and Okp1 represents a missing link in the budding yeast kinetochore. Genes Dev 13: 1140–1155.
69. Enquist-NewmanM, CheesemanIM, Van GoorD, DrubinDG, MeluhPB, et al. (2001) Dad1p, third component of the Duo1p/Dam1p complex involved in kinetochore function and mitotic spindle integrity. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2601–2613.
70. LiY, BachantJ, AlcasabasAA, WangY, QinJ, et al. (2002) The mitotic spindle is required for loading of the DASH complex onto the kinetochore. Genes Dev 16: 183–197.
71. BigginsS, BhallaN, ChangA, SmithDL, MurrayAW (2001) Genes Involved in Sister Chromatid Separation and Segregation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159: 453–470.
72. LongtineMS, McKenzieA3rd, DemariniDJ, ShahNG, WachA, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953–961.
73. GelbartME, RechsteinerT, RichmondTJ, TsukiyamaT (2001) Interactions of Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex with nucleosomal arrays: analyses using recombinant yeast histones and immobilized templates. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2098–2106.
74. GoldsteinAL, McCuskerJH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553.
75. PinskyBA, TatsutaniSY, CollinsKA, BigginsS (2003) An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. Dev Cell 5: 735–745.
76. SikorskiRS, HieterP (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19–27.
77. AkiyoshiB, BigginsS (2010) Cdc14-dependent dephosphorylation of a kinetochore protein prior to anaphase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186: 1487–1491.
78. BigginsS, SeverinFF, BhallaN, SassoonI, HymanAA, et al. (1999) The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev 13: 532–544.
79. SwerdlowPS, FinleyD, VarshavskyA (1986) Enhancement of immunoblot sensitivity by heating of hydrated filters. Anal Biochem 156: 147–153.