1. PetronczkiM, SiomosMF, NasmythK (2003) Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112: 423–440.
2. HassoldT, HuntP (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nature reviews 2: 280–291.
3. KeeneyS (2008) Spo11 and the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genome dynamics and stability 2: 81–123.
4. NealeMJ, KeeneyS (2006) Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 442: 153–158.
5. SheridanS, BishopDK (2006) Red-Hed regulation: recombinase Rad51, though capable of playing the leading role, may be relegated to supporting Dmc1 in budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev 20: 1685–1691.
6. Hunter N (2007) Meiotic Recombination; Aguilera A, Rothstein R, editors. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 381–462 p.
7. DresserME, EwingDJ, ConradMN, DominguezAM, BarsteadR, et al. (1997) DMC1 functions in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic pathway that is largely independent of the RAD51 pathway. Genetics 147: 533–544.
8. PetukhovaG, SungP, KleinH (2000) Promotion of Rad51-dependent D-loop formation by yeast recombination factor Rdh54/Tid1. Genes Dev 14: 2206–2215.
9. PetukhovaG, Van KomenS, VerganoS, KleinH, SungP (1999) Yeast Rad54 promotes Rad51-dependent homologous DNA pairing via ATP hydrolysis-driven change in DNA double helix conformation. J Biol Chem 274: 29453–29462.
10. RaschleM, Van KomenS, ChiP, EllenbergerT, SungP (2004) Multiple interactions with the Rad51 recombinase govern the homologous recombination function of Rad54. J Biol Chem 279: 51973–51780.
11. CeballosSJ, HeyerWD (2011) Functions of the Snf2/Swi2 family Rad54 motor protein in homologous recombination. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1809: 509–523.
12. HolzenTM, ShahPP, OlivaresHA, BishopDK (2006) Tid1/Rdh54 promotes dissociation of Dmc1 from nonrecombinogenic sites on meiotic chromatin. Genes Dev 20: 2593–2604.
13. KleinHL (1997) RDH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Genetics 147: 1533–1543.
14. ShinoharaM, Shita-YamaguchiE, BuersteddeJ-M, ShinagawaH, OgawaH, et al. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homolog of RAD54, RDH54/TID1 in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147: 1545–1556.
15. NimonkarAV, DombrowskiCC, SiinoJS, StasiakAZ, StasiakA, et al. (2012) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dmc1 and Rad51 preferentially function with Tid1 and Rad54, respectively, to promote DNA strand invasion during genetic recombination. J Biol Chem 287: 28727–28737.
16. PanJ, SasakiM, KniewelR, MurakamiH, BlitzblauHG, et al. (2011) A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144: 719–731.
17. ChenSY, TsubouchiT, RockmillB, SandlerJS, RichardsDR, et al. (2008) Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev Cell 15: 401–415.
18. ManceraE, BourgonR, BrozziA, HuberW, SteinmetzLM (2008) High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454: 479–485.
19. SchwachaA, KlecknerN (1997) Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123–1135.
20. BzymekM, ThayerNH, OhSD, KlecknerN, HunterN (2010) Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 464: 937–941.
21. KadykLC, HartwellLH (1992) Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132: 387–402.
22. PageSL, HawleyRS (2004) The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annual review of cell and developmental biology 20: 525–558.
23. BailisJM, RoederGS (1998) Synaptonemal complex morphogenesis and sister-chromatid cohesion require Mek1-dependent phosphorylation of a meiotic chromosomal protein. Genes Dev 12: 3551–3563.
24. HollingsworthNM, GoetschL, ByersB (1990) The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 61: 73–84.
25. SmithAV, RoederGS (1997) The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol 136: 957–967.
26. HollingsworthNM, ByersB (1989) HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics 121: 445–462.
27. KimKP, WeinerBM, ZhangL, JordanA, DekkerJ, et al. (2010) Sister cohesion and structural axis components mediate homolog bias of meiotic recombination. Cell 143: 924–937.
28. Mao-DraayerY, GalbraithAM, PittmanDL, CoolM, MaloneRE (1996) Analysis of meiotic recombination pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144: 71–86.
29. RockmillB, RoederGS (1990) Meiosis in asynaptic yeast. Genetics 126: 563–574.
30. RockmillB, RoederGS (1991) A meiosis-specific protein kinase homologue required for chromosome synapsis and recombination. Genes Dev 5: 2392–2404.
31. ThompsonDA, StahlFW (1999) Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153: 621–641.
32. NiuH, WanL, BaumgartnerB, SchaeferD, LoidlJ, et al. (2005) Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5804–5818.
33. BlatY, KlecknerN (1999) Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98: 249–259.
34. PanizzaS, MendozaMA, BerlingerM, HuangL, NicolasA, et al. (2011) Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146: 372–383.
35. CarballoJA, JohnsonAL, SedgwickSG, ChaRS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758–770.
36. NiuH, LiX, JobE, ParkC, MoazedD, et al. (2007) Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5456–5467.
37. BishopDK (1994) RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79: 1081–1092.
38. LaoJP, OhSD, ShinoharaM, ShinoharaA, HunterN (2008) Rad52 promotes postinvasion steps of meiotic double-strand-break repair. Mol Cell 29: 517–524.
39. LiW, ChenC, Markmann-MulischU, TimofejevaL, SchmelzerE, et al. (2004) The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 gene is dispensable for vegetative development but required for meiosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101: 10596–10601.
40. ShinoharaA, GasiorS, OgawaT, KlecknerN, BishopDK (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2: 615–629.
41. KurzbauerMT, UanschouC, ChenD, SchlogelhoferP (2012) The recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 are functionally and spatially separated during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24: 2058–2070.
42. CallenderTL, HollingsworthNM (2010) Mek1 suppression of meiotic double-strand break repair is specific to sister chromatids, chromosome autonomous and independent of Rec8 cohesin complexes. Genetics 185: 771–782.
43. CloudV, ChanY-L, GrubbJ, BudkeB, BishopDK (2012) Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis. Science 337: 1222–1225.
44. BishopDK, ParkD, XuL, KlecknerN (1992) DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation and cell cycle progression. Cell 69: 439–456.
45. LydallD, NikolskyY, BishopDK, WeinertT (1996) A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383: 840–843.
46. WanL, de los SantosT, ZhangC, ShokatK, HollingsworthNM (2004) Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic DSB repair in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15: 11–23.
47. BusyginaV, SehornMG, ShiIY, TsubouchiH, RoederGS, et al. (2008) Hed1 regulates Rad51-mediated recombination via a novel mechanism. Genes Dev 22: 786–795.
48. TsubouchiH, RoederGS (2006) Budding yeast Hed1 down-regulates the mitotic recombination machinery when meiotic recombination is impaired. Genes Dev 20: 1766–1775.
49. NiuH, WanL, BusyginaV, KwonY, AllenJA, et al. (2009) Regulation of meiotic recombination via Mek1-mediated Rad54 phosphorylation. Mol Cell 36: 393–404.
50. BishopDK, NikolskiY, OshiroJ, ChonJ, ShinoharaM, et al. (1999) High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1-independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 4: 425–443.
51. TsubouchiH, RoederGS (2003) The importance of genetic recombination for fidelity of chromosome pairing in meiosis. Dev Cell 5: 915–925.
52. GoldfarbT, LichtenM (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biology 8: e1000520.
53. KinebuchiT, KagawaW, EnomotoR, TanakaK, MiyagawaK, et al. (2004) Structural basis for octameric ring formation and DNA interaction of the human homologous-pairing protein Dmc1. Mol Cell 14: 363–374.
54. BusyginaV, GainesW, XuY, KwonY, WilliamsG, et al. (2013) Functional attributes of the S. cerevisiae meiotic recombinase Dmc1. DNA Repair 12: 707–712.
55. KurokawaY, MurayamaY, Haruta-TakahashiN, UrabeI, IwasakiH (2008) Reconstitution of DNA strand exchange mediated by Rhp51 recombinase and two mediators. PLoS biology 6: e88.
56. LeeMH, ChangYC, HongEL, GrubbJ, ChangCS, et al. (2005) Calcium ion promotes yeast Dmc1 activity via formation of long and fine helical filaments with single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem 280: 40980–40984.
57. BugreevDV, PezzaRJ, MazinaOM, VoloshinON, Camerini-OteroRD, et al. (2011) The resistance of DMC1 D-loops to dissociation may account for the DMC1 requirement in meiosis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 56–60.
58. ChiP, KwonY, SeongC, EpshteinA, LamI, et al. (2006) Yeast recombination factor Rdh54 functionally interacts with the Rad51 recombinase and catalyzes Rad51 removal from DNA. J Biol Chem 281: 26268–26279.
59. HunterN, KlecknerN (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double- strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59–70.
60. AndersonCM, ChenSY, DimonMT, OkeA, DeRisiJL, et al. (2011) ReCombine: a suite of programs for detection and analysis of meiotic recombination in whole-genome datasets. PloS One 6: e25509.
61. MartiniE, DiazRL, HunterN, KeeneyS (2006) Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126: 285–295.
62. SturtevantAH (1913) The linear arrangment of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J Exptl Zool 14: 43–59.
63. HollingsworthNM, PonteL, HalseyC (1995) MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev 9: 1728–1739.
64. OhSD, JessopL, LaoJP, AllersT, LichtenM, et al. (2009) Stabilization and electrophoretic analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557: 209–234.
65. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47–57.
66. ChuS, HerskowitzI (1998) Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. Mol Cell 1: 685–696.
67. SourirajanA, LichtenM (2008) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev 22: 2627–2632.
68. XuL, AjimuraM, PadmoreR, KleinC, KlecknerN (1995) NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 15: 6572–6581.
69. XuL, WeinerBM, KlecknerN (1997) Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev 11: 106–118.
70. ChuangCN, ChengYH, WangTF (2012) Mek1 stabilizes Hop1-Thr318 phosphorylation to promote interhomolog recombination and checkpoint responses during yeast meiosis. Nucleic acids research 40: 11416–11427.
71. StromL, LindroosHB, ShirahigeK, SjogrenC (2004) Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 16: 1003–1015.
72. UnalE, Arbel-EdenA, SattlerU, ShroffR, LichtenM, et al. (2004) DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16: 991–1002.
73. WatrinE, PetersJM (2006) Cohesin and DNA damage repair. Exp Cell Res 312: 2687–2693.
74. KleinF, MahrP, GalovaM, BuonomoSBC, MichaelisC, et al. (1999) A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements and recombination during meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103.
75. CouteauF, NabeshimaK, VilleneuveA, ZetkaM (2004) A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Curr Biol 14: 585–592.
76. DanielK, LangeJ, HachedK, FuJ, AnastassiadisK, et al. (2011) Meiotic homologue alignment and its quality surveillance are controlled by mouse HORMAD1. Nat Cell Biol 13: 599–610.
77. FerdousM, HigginsJD, OsmanK, LambingC, RoitingerE, et al. (2012) Inter-homolog crossing-over and synapsis in Arabidopsis meiosis are dependent on the chromosome axis protein AtASY3. PLoS Genet 8: e1002507.
78. LiXC, Bolcun-FilasE, SchimentiJC (2011) Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice. Genetics 189: 71–82.
79. Sanchez-MoranE, SantosJL, JonesGH, FranklinFC (2007) ASY1 mediates AtDMC1-dependent interhomolog recombination during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 21: 2220–2233.
80. VilleneuveAM, HillersKJ (2001) Whence meiosis? Cell 106: 647–650.
81. ShinoharaM, GasiorSL, BishopDK, ShinoharaA (2000) Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10814–10819.
82. GoldsteinAL, McCuskerJH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553.
83. LongtineMS, McKenzieA3rd, DemariniDJ, ShahNG, WachA, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953–961.
84. Tong A, Boone C (2005) Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Second ed. Totowa, NJ, USA: The Humana Press, Inc. pp. 171–192.
85. RothsteinR (1991) Targeting, disruption, replacement and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol 194: 281–301.
86. ChenSY, FungJC (2011) Mapping of crossover sites using DNA microarrays. Meth Mol Biol 745: 117–134.
87. HongEJ, ShinoharaA, BishopDK (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dmc1 protein promotes renaturation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and assimilation of ssDNA into homologous super-coiled duplex DNA. J Biol Chem 276: 41906–41912.
88. SikorskiRS, HieterP (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19–27.
89. Miller JH (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
90. Van KomenS, MacrisM, SehornMG, SungP (2006) Purification and assays of Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologous recombination proteins. Methods Enzymol 408: 445–463.
91. San FilippoJ, ChiP, SehornMG, EtchinJ, KrejciL, et al. (2006) Recombination mediator and Rad51 targeting activities of a human BRCA2 polypeptide. J Biol Chem 281: 11649–11657.
92. de los SantosT, HollingsworthNM (1999) Red1p: A MEK1-dependent phosphoprotein that physically interacts with Hop1p during meiosis in yeast. J Biol Chem 274: 1783–1790.
93. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
94. WinzelerEA, RichardsDR, ConwayAR, GoldsteinAL, KalmanS, et al. (1998) Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281: 1194–1197.